1. To realize that one is always engaged in discourse.
2. To realize that for the sake of stability, everything relies on presuppositions.
3. To realize that one inhabits a dichotomy, and that to ignore one side/any part of a dichotomy is to deny yourself knowledge of the way things actually are.
4. To realize that language is the furthest thing from static.
5. To realize that the meaning of anything is not determined by the speaker, but by the listener. Read Also : If climate change skeptics believe that the consensus is wrong, then what do they base their beliefs on? Why do they trust them? How did most studying climate change get it wrong? Should we doubt medicine, airplanes, computers, and astronomy as well?